The video shows a heated discussion about sexism on a podcast.
- A blonde woman in a pink top accuses the male podcast host of being sexist. She initially claims he tries to make them view things from a male perspective (“you don’t know how men think”) and argues that just as he might not know how women think, that doesn’t make him sexist.
- The host interjects, “but it kind of does,” implying his actions might be.
- Another woman (blonde with bangs, eating a popsicle) chimes in, telling the host, “then you’re sexist too” and “Your whole podcast is sexist.”
- The first woman elaborates that the host “come[s] on here to try to get provoke women on purpose.”
- The host asks her to define sexism. She defines it as being “mistreated in the workplace” or “not getting the same rights as a man.”
- The host then questions if, by her definition, sexism can only impact women and if one can’t be sexist towards men.
- The woman concedes one can be sexist towards men but argues “it’s not in terms of safety, reality. It’s different.”
- The host counters that men are more likely to be victims of violent crime. The woman tries to steer the conversation away from violent crime and SA (sexual assault).
- The host then points out that it’s “convenient if the definition of [rape] makes it impossible for it to be something that can happen to a man.”
- The woman says, “Of course a man can be graped [sic].”
- The host (facepalming) clarifies that “there are specific jurisdictions where based on the definition of the actual crime of grape [sic, rape], it is impossible for a man to be victim of the crime.”